During her practice, Ms. WANG Yuting has adhered to professional ethics all the time, and actively upheld the dignity of the law to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the clients and fulfill the social responsibilities and legal obligations as a lawyer; voluntarily made intensified efforts for professional study while familiarizing herself with laws and regulations to conduct legal research in relevant fields and improve professional knowledge; paid attention to judicial practices to incorporate legislative provisions in solution of actual problems on the basis of upholding the idea of rule of law and legal principles while conducting analysis corresponding to specific issues, and improved professional competence and case handling capabilities through practices, hence receiving the recognition of clients and praise of other lawyers for her professionalism and carefulness. In the past 10 years, Ms. WANG handled hundreds of criminal, civil, and economic contract dispute cases throughout China to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of clients, none of which has been complained about. She was recognized as an “Advanced Individual in Legal Aid of Haidian District” for two consecutive years in 2019 and 2020.
As a member of the Discipline Committee of Haidian District Lawyers Association, Ms. WANG disciplined herself to practice in a compliant manner and learned lessons from complaints to voluntarily restrain herself in practice. She reviewed 10 complaint cases as the main reviewer, and performed quality check on 13 review reports. She can promptly and efficiently complete review tasks assigned by the Discipline Committee.
As a member of the Female Lawyer Work Committee of Haidian District Lawyers Association, she actively fulfilled duties and voluntarily participated in shift tasks at the Center for Protection of Female and Children of Haidian District. When facing complicated situations during her shift, Ms. WANG Yuting was patient in listening to the statements of visitors, helped visitors analyze the root cause to identify the cause of their problems, provided concrete legal opinions and suggestions, and properly handled tens of cases of divorce, inheritance, and support rights, which were highly praised by visitors and achieved favorable social effects.
As the Director of the Department of Public Benefit and Legal Aid, Ms. WANG Yuting led lawyers of this law firm to properly conduct public benefit and legal aid efforts by actively participating in public benefit and legal aid activities and legal popularization efforts. In 2023, we accepted a total of 118 legal aid cases, including 108 legal aid cases of Haidian District and 5 legal aid cases of Beijing. When providing legal aid either for civil cases or criminal defense, Ms. WANG upheld professional ethics to carefully answer actual legal questions, promptly provided legal opinions, and provided quality services to properly safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved with the satisfaction rate of 100%, which reflected the social value of legal aid for public benefits.
As a CPC member, Ms. WANG Yuting kept the purpose of the Party in mind without forgetting her identity as a Party member. She considered the big picture, disciplined herself, and followed rules to voluntarily participate in education activities for “remaining true to the original aspiration and keeping in mind of the mission” under the leadership of the Party branch at the law firm. She voluntarily engaged in study of political theories, visited the Memorial Hall for the Site of Jiaozhuang Tunnel Warfare and the Exhibition of Great Journey and Brilliant Achievements in Celebration of the 70th Anniversary of the Founding of the People’s Republic of China, Huanghuacheng Lakeside Great Wall, and the Party day activity under the theme of “Celebration of the Mid-autumn Festival of the Blossom & Credit Family” to feel the revolutionary spirit of braveness and hardworking of martyrs to the revolution, to appreciate the splendid achievements during the process of national rejuvenation, to experience the warm family with the Party branch at the core, to insist on “four matters of confidence”, to adhere to “four consciousnesses”, to practice “two safeguards”, and to set herself as an example of CPC members to give full play of the model function of a Party member.
Moreover, Ms. WANG Yuting actively participated in shift tasks of the P2P Emergency Response Office of Haidian Financial Administration to contribute her professional knowledge to the handling of issues involving law and litigation at the risk mediation center in the P2P field of Haidian District, making great contributions to the elimination of conflict and maintenance of society stability.
In the case of GUO for suspected fraud, after court hearing for five times at Chaoyang People’s Court, Chaoyang Procuratorate withdrew the accusation of suspected fraud against GUO and eventually issued a decision for non-prosecution;
In the case of YANG for suspected of providing a venue for drug users, Ms. WANG Yuting bailed YANG out at the investigation stage; by now, the bail period has expired and the case has been withdrawn;
In the case of MA for suspected of drug trafficking, Ms. WANG Yuting bailed MA out at the investigation stage; by now, the bail period has expired and the case has been withdrawn;
In the case of PENG for illegal manufacturing of ammunition, thanks to Ms. WANG Yuting’s efforts, the Second Intermediate People’s Court of Beijing accepted the opinions of Ms. WANG Yuting as the attorney and imposed lenient punishment on PENG;
In the case of WANG for compulsory medical treatment, Ms. WANG Yuting successfully defended WANG by releasing the compulsory medical treatment;
In the case of dispute over borrowing agreement between a company in Zibo City, Shandong Province and a company in Weihai City, Shandong Province, Ms. WANG Yuting represented the defendant Zibo company. The Weihai company claimed the refund of the principal and interests in the amount of over RMB 1 million. All the claims of the plaintiff were rejected in the trial of the first instance, and in the trial of the second instance initiated by the plaintiff Weihai company unsatisfied with the judgment of the first instance, Weihai Intermediate People’s Court finally ruled that the borrowing agreement was invalid, and the defendant was only required to refund the principal of over RMB 0.50 million.
