As a bachelor of law from Nankai University, Mr. CUI Baoman is an scholar lawyer, acting as the Director of the Legal Risk and Compliance Management Department.
Mr. CUI is a member of the China Law Society, a member of the Committee for Legal Risk and Compliance Management Practice of the 11th Beijing Lawyers Association, and a member of the Committee for Product Quality of the 10th Beijing Lawyers Association. He used to be a member of the Committee for Lawyer Rights of Haidian District Lawyers Association and a lawyer mediator for Haidian People’s Court. Moreover, Mr. CUI is a researcher of China Business Law Society, a researcher of the Task Group of Empirical Study on Legal Risks of Listed Companies in China, and a senior enterprise (legal) risk manager accredited by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of China.
Being honest, dedicated, diligent, and responsible, Mr. CUI has extremely strong sense of responsibility and mission to maintain social fairness and justice, and has earned a good reputation in the industry for his competitive advantages by combining extensive knowledge with intensified professionalism and his spirit for pursuit of greater perfection. He has handled many litigation and non-litigation cases during his practicing career, acts as a permanent legal advisor to many large- and medium-sized enterprises, and has won many difficult and complicated cases.
Publications: Differences Between Litigation Lawyers and Legal Risk Management, Corporate Social Responsibilities from the Perspective of Consumer Protection, Preliminary Study of Piercing the Corporate Veil, Several Issues in Separation of Ownership of Commercial Housing, Nature Identification of Commercial Housing Subscription, Comments on Cases: Can a Supporter Be a Devisee, Primary Analysis of the Pros and Cons of Judgment Not Supporting Divorce in the Trial for the First Instance, On the Burden of Proof for Creditors to Exercise the Right of Revocation, Study on the Burden of Proof of the Plaintiff in Civil Litigation, etc.
Won the trial for the first instance in a case of dispute over execution for repurchase of national bonds between Shanghai X Securities Co., Ltd. and Jiangxi X Trust Investment Co., Ltd. (for the amount of over RMB 20.00 million), which involved a frontier issue in the corporate legal theory;
Successfully applied for and won the retrial with respect to the mediation decision in the case of dispute over loans of CHEN v. WANG, YU, and LI;
Won the administrative litigation for Hou v. Beijing X Government;
Represented MA free of charge in the case of execution for labor arbitration with Tianjin X Wire Drawing. Facing the incorrect decision for which the respondent no longer existed at the time of issuing the decision, communicated with the labor bureau and court to eventually get the execution amounts by means of judicial aid;
In the case of HAN v. X property management and the real estate developer for compensation of damages, correctly identified the defendant and cause of action and properly set the amount claimed, which were fully consistent with the judgment with highly accurate amount claimed;
In the case of division of properties after divorce of LIANG, despite the many lawyers consulted who considered that the period of litigation had expired, Mr. CUI considered that the properties that were jointly owned by the husband and wife but not divided shall not be subject to the period of litigation, and won the trial for the first instance to take back the properties for the client that had been lost for nearly 10 years;
In the case of LIANG for labor dispute, Mr. CUI raised counterclaim on the ground that was not known by the court, while the court supported Mr. CUI’s opinions after studying the legislative provisions together with the lawyer of the counterparty, and the counterparty had no choice but to agree with the mediation, and made payment on the spot to the satisfaction of the client.
In the case of dispute over notes for Beijing X University, fully recovered losses on the expired bill of exchange to the satisfaction of the client;
In the case of fraud by BIE, the judge supported Mr. CUI’s defense opinions and did not support the fact falsified by the informant, and the client was satisfied with the results;
In the case of dispute over copyright for a company, the court adopted Mr. CUI’s opinions to hold the counterparty had no copyright and reject the claims of the counterparty; the client was satisfied with the results.
The cases above are typical cases that are very difficult. There are many other successful cases in which Mr. CUI is highly praised by clients for diligence and sense of responsibility.
